top of page
Search

Tony Whitehead



The deep peats of Dartmoor’s Commons support internationally important areas of blanket bog. However, they are in a much diminished condition. Last month, Natural England published new assessments that described this habitat as being in unfavourable condition and, in some cases, in decline.


The key reason for this poor condition is the degraded state of the peat on Dartmoor. It has suffered historical cutting and drainage, military activity, and, for decades, intensive burning (known as “swaling” on Dartmoor) tied to managing land to support high numbers of livestock, both cattle and sheep. This resulted in a drop in the water table across the high moor and the drying and erosion of the peat.


This drop in the water table has also changed the vegetation's nature. Peat-forming sphagnum mosses are a vital component of any blanket bog. But they can only thrive in waterlogged conditions when the water table is at or very near the surface. Once it drops, they lose their competitive edge to deeper-rooted plants still able to access water. This is where the Purple Moor Grass, Molinia, comes in.


Molina is a perfectly natural component of a healthy bog. However, it is balanced with other species. Once the peat degrades, the Molinia is given an advantage; its roots are able to reach down to the lowered water table, which other plants cannot reach. Not only that, when a blanket bog is regularly burned, the sphagnum is irreparably damaged.  Like most grasses, Molinia thrives after fires – it regrows from its base into a space now cleared of competitors.


As if this isn’t enough encouragement, animals graze around the Molinia, further removing competition.  The palatability of Molinia is something we’ll return to in a moment. The icing on the cake for Molinia was, from the 80s, the huge increase in atmospheric nitrogen – in short, it started to rain fertiliser on Dartmoor, a final boost for the grass.


On the peripheries of the high moor, high livestock numbers in the 80s and 90s may have suppressed the Molinia’s vigour for a while in the days when favourable subsidies supported numbers of animals way in excess of sustainable limits.  Cattle and ponies will eat the grass, but it is only palatable in Spring; its nutritional value declines rapidly as it dies off in autumn (it is a deciduous grass). They will also trample it. However, the central and more inaccessible parts of the high moor may have long been dominated by the knee-deep tussocks so well known by hikers – archival photographs suggest this.


From the 2000s, much-needed controls on the excessive grazing, combined with a fall in stock numbers post foot and mouth, may have allowed the Molinia to become more vigorous, but by this time, the plant's hold was established.  This is an important point – the plant did not suddenly gain dominance due to a fall in livestock numbers, as some on Dartmoor have it – often those with a vested interest in increasing grazing.  Its rise to dominance has been a much longer process, and is a symptom of degraded peat.


Fortunately, the symptom points to the cure. Raising the water table and restoring the peat is the only way to restore the blanket bogs and restore balance to the system, where Molinia is in healthy balance with other plants.  In this way, the habitat can be returned to favourable condition, with all the societal benefits that flow from healthy bogs - carbon sequestration, flood control, clean water, etc. Rewetting the peat will, of course, also increase the peat’s resilience to wildfire. The South West Peat Partnership is doing some great work on Dartmoor in this respect.


Crucially and perhaps controversially, livestock have no useful purpose in restoring and maintaining Dartmoor’s blanket bogs.  Some argue that cattle on the high moor in Spring and Summer can be used to suppress the Molinia.


First, there’s the simple point that even if grazing was useful, the cattle to do this are probably not available, and even if they were, there are practical problems about how commoners can keep cattle on the high moor. I imagine nothing more galling than to take a herd to the central high moor to find the animals back at the moor gate the following day because that’s where all the nice grass is!  Remember that the central parts of moor are very poor grazing land because the vegetation underpinned by the peat lacks the minerals necessary for a healthy diet.


Second, cattle grazing Molinia might cause more damage than they cure by trampling sphagnum and other plants that survive in places beneath it. If you look at the Molinia-dominated parts of the moor, on many of the slopes, it is something of a monoculture, but on the flatter, still-wet bits, you will often find cotton grass and moss around the Molinia, just awaiting restoration to flourish and spread. 



In relation to trampling, we also need to consider the potential damage caused by commoners accessing their herds using 4WD vehicles and quad bikes (note that the peat restoration teams deliberately use low ground pressure, wide track machines to avoid damage).


Third, perhaps also controversially, while awaiting restoration, the Molinia can still provide a valuable role even where it is dominant. It protects the underlying peat from exposure to the atmosphere, and it may slow the flow of water off the moor. It’s not ideal, but it’s not useless either.


Given this, it’s high time we looked again at the role of commoners in relation to the restoration of the blanket bogs.  Currently, they are paid through Higher Level Stewardship to graze Molinia-dominated areas.  For the above reasons, this may not be necessary. What we need to do is rewet the bogs. Without this, to be blunt, grazing the Molinia will achieve nothing. Then, once rewetted, we need to maintain the restored area, but here again, grazing is unnecessary, as a recently published Natural England report on the favourable condition of blanket bogs stated (my emphasis): 


Large areas of the English uplands, including areas of blanket bog, are subject to livestock grazing. There are fewer grazing animals now than before headage payment subsidies ended in 2005. Future trends in livestock numbers are uncertain but grazing management is not required to maintain blanket bog, so further reduction or cessation of grazing is not a threat to this habitat.


The suggestion, therefore, is to stop paying for grazing the Molinia through Higher Level Stewardship and instead direct the money towards providing opportunities for commoners to become more involved in the peat restoration work. We need to level up the amount we are doing, which requires materials, knowledge of the land, and willing hands with practical skills. There’s also a role possibly in the aftercare of the works – dams built to hold back water need checking and maintenance.


In summary, the restoration of Dartmoor’s blanket bogs is vital and dependent on rewetting.  Grazing has no role in restoration and maintenance, but there are new opportunities for the profitable involvement of the local commoning community and others.


 
 
 

Tony Whitehead



Without so much as a whisper publicly, Natural England this week updated its assessment of Dartmoor’s protected sites, the three big Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) that cover Dartmoor's commons. The new assessments covered 22,494ha - 24% of the whole National Park - and are based on an extensive survey by Natural England in 2024. 


It is not a pretty picture. 


To summarise, every designated feature assessed is in unfavourable condition, with the exception of two tiny “soakaways” in East and North Dartmoor. That’s all Dartmoor’s blanket bogs, wet heaths, and dry heaths. And worse still, many are declining in condition. 


Regarding the individual SSSI units (subdivisions of the whole), if you look at those newly assessed only 26ha of 22,494ha are in favourable condition. If you compare that with the previous assessments of those same units, that’s a significant drop from a still dismal 914ha  in favourable condition. Notably, the land area in unfavourable declining condition has doubled from 1,527ha to 3,178ha.


You can read the assessments for the designated features and the units of each SSSI here, here and here.  


Despite many millions of pounds of public investment in Dartmoor over the past three decades, Dartmoor’s commons remain in appalling condition. This begs two crucial questions - what exactly has the taxpayer paid for? And secondly, with agri-environment schemes (Higher Level Stewardship) currently being extended, what are we going to be paying for? 


At the inaugural meeting of the new Dartmoor Land Use Management group in January, a local Natural England Officer said that NE would “very shortly be communicating with HLS agreement holders, offering two-year extensions to current agreements subject to some potential ‘tweaks’ to management plans".


Potential tweaks? Given the appalling state of the commons, it would not be unreasonable to demand a little more than possible “tweaks” to schemes that have so singularly failed to deliver more nature, and in many cases simply paid for decline. Surely we should be asking for wholesale reform?  


Or perhaps we should not be paying any more taxpayers’ money to Dartmoor commons schemes that have so obviously failed, and spend it instead where it could make a genuine difference.


To be clear - this is not a criticism of all agri-environmnet schemes per se or of ambitious farmers that use the investment wisely to deliver for nature.  We know that many farmers on Dartmoor are keen for change - support for the Central Dartmoor Landscape Recovery scheme is an example. But the fact remains, that the taxpayers must see a return on their investment and begin to see nature restored rather than in decline. 


With these questions in mind, here’s a background and summary of the assessments. 


Background


The majority of Dartmoor’s common land is notified as Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI). The first designations of SSSI on Dartmoor were in 1952 with further designation in 1976. The current suite of SSSIs were designated in 1987 and 1989 with renotification and extension of the original sites under the Wildlife and Countryside Act, 1981.


SSSI selection is based on the presence of the particular features of interest. It operates on a principle of establishing a network of sites representing in total those parts of Great Britain in which the features of nature are most highly concentrated or of highest value. 


These large upland SSSIs recognised the importance of Dartmoor’s blanket bogs and heathland, based on a national listing of ‘near natural’ or semi-natural’ special sites first developed in 1947. The rationale for notification was to notify a large area to include examples of vegetation types that are distinct from other parts of Britain.


The vegetation of Dartmoor is of particular interest for its extensive areas of internationally important blanket bog and some of the best areas of wet heath in England. These wet and predominantly western communities occur alongside equally important dry heath.


There are three SSSIs covering the commons: 


East Dartmoor SSSI (211.36 ha) was first notified in 1976 and notified under the 1981 Act in 1987 with amendments to the boundary including extensions and deletions.


South Dartmoor (9,668.2 ha) was notified in 1952, revised in 1976 and notified under the 1981 Act in 1989, with amendments to the boundary including extensions and deletions. The SSSI name has been changed from Central South Dartmoor. The site now includes High-house Waste, formerly part of Hawn's Wood and High House Moor SSSI (now Dendles Wood SSSI). Part of the site notified initially in 1951 has since been re-notified as part of the Holne Woodlands SSSI.


North Dartmoor (13,413 ha) was notified in 1952, revised in 1976 and notified under the 1981 Act in 1989, with amendments to the boundary including extensions and deletions. The extensions include the formerly separate Gidleigh Common SSSI and Black Tor Copse Forest Nature Reserve.


Monitoring SSSI Condition


SSSI condition was not objectively assessed when the Dartmoor SSSIs were notified in the 1950’s. Selection was based on the presence of key features rather than their condition. 


At the time of the notification under the Wildlife and Countryside Act in the 1980s, it was recognized that a large proportion of the Dartmoor's SSSIs supported degraded examples of habitat. However, these were the best examples available and were sufficiently intact to be of special interest. A potential for recovery was recognised.


The objective assessment of SSSI condition, referred to as Common Standards Monitoring (CSM), was introduced in 1998 (JNCC 2004). Natural England is responsible for assessing the condition of all SSSIs using CSM.


Using the CSM methodology, Natural England produces a Monitoring Specification (aka Favourable Condition Tables), which sets the attributes and targets used to assess the current state of each designated site feature. 


On Dartmoor the designated features of the SSSI are: Blanket Bogs and Valley Bogs, Wet Heaths, Acid Grassland, Subalpine Dwarf Shrub Heath, Soakaways and Sumps and Short Sedge Acidic Fen. 


The Monitoring Specifications for the three Dartmoor SSSIs can be found here:



The data collected through CSM surveys then defines the following categories, which are used to describe the condition of the SSSI:  


Favourable - The designated feature is being adequately conserved.


Unfavourable recovering - The feature is not yet fully conserved but the necessary actions to achieve favourable condition have either been identified and recorded, or at least one action underway or no actions behind schedule


Unfavourable no change -  The feature is not being conserved. It will not reach favourable condition unless there are changes to the management or external pressures. The longer the feature remains in this poor condition, the more difficult it will be, in general, to achieve recovery. 


Unfavourable declining - The feature is not being conserved and will not reach favourable condition unless there are changes to management or external pressures. The feature condition is becoming progressively worse. The longer the feature remains in this poor condition, the more difficult it will be, in general, to achieve recovery. 


In addition to detailing the site's condition using the above categories, CSM also identifies the pressures and threats to designated features evident in the collected data.  These are those things driving a designated feature into unfavourable condition. 


In the 2024 Dartmoor survey, “Whole feature assessments” were introduced to assess the condition of designated features (eg Blanket Bogs etc) across the whole of the SSSIs. 


The Results


The following summarises the condition of each key feature: 


Table 1: Condition of SSSI Designated Features:

SSSI

Designated Feature

Condition 2024

South Dartmoor SSSI

Acid Grassland

Unfavourable Declining

North Dartmoor SSSI

Acid Grassland 

Unfavourable No Change 

East Dartmoor SSSI

Acid Grassland / Dry Heath Mosaic

Unfavourable Declining

East Dartmoor SSSI

Blanket and Valley Bogs

Unfavourable Declining

North Dartmoor SSSI

Blanket and Valley Bogs

Unfavourable No Change 

South Dartmoor SSSI

Blanket and Valley Bogs

Unfavourable Declining

East Dartmoor SSSI

Short Sedge Acidic Fen

Unfavourable No Change 

North Dartmoor SSSI

Short Sedge Acidic Fen

Unfavourable No Change 

South Dartmoor SSSI

Short Sedge Acidic Fen

Unfavourable Declining

East Dartmoor SSSI

Soakaway and Sump

Favourable

North Dartmoor SSSI

Soakaway and Sump

Favourable

South Dartmoor SSSI

Soakaway and Sump

Unfavourable Declining

East Dartmoor SSSI

Subalpine dwarf shrub heath

Unfavourable Declining

North Dartmoor SSSI

Subalpine dwarf shrub heath

Unfavourable No Change 

South Dartmoor SSSI

Subalpine dwarf shrub heath

Unfavourable Declining

East Dartmoor SSSI

Wet Heath

Unfavourable Declining

North Dartmoor SSSI

Wet Heath

Unfavourable No Change 

South Dartmoor SSSI

Wet Heath

Unfavourable Declining


In terms of whole features, only the very small soakaways and sumps in East and North Dartmoor were found to be in Favourable Condition. 


Every other designated feature is in unfavourable condition, which means that “the feature is not being conserved” and “It will not reach favourable condition unless there are changes to the management or external pressures.”


Ten features are in declining condition, which means their condition is becoming progressively worse, and “the longer the feature remains in this poor condition, the more difficult it will be, in general, to achieve recovery.” 


Comparison by Unit with Previous Condition


The assessment also looked at individual SSSI - subdivisions of the whole SSSIs.  There’s much to look at here, and we’ll come back to this.  Looking at individual units and knowing their area allows us to compare the current condition with the previous condition. The latest assessments included all units across all three SSSI’s with the exception of North Dartmoor Unit 91, Blackator Copse and South Dartmoor Unit 3 Foxtor Mire. 


Of the total area assessed, only three units, amounting to 26ha were found to be in Favourable Condition. Overall the area of units in favourable condition has fallen from 914ha previously. Notably, the area of land in unfavourable declining condition has increased from 1,527ha to 3,178ha.


Pressures


The table below summarises the key pressures. 


The first thing to note is how many times overgrazing is listed as a pressure. It is clear that this still remains a key issue for Dartmoor. Alongside this, undergrazing is listed on a number of occasions, where it is linked to the dominance of the Purple Moor Grass, aka “Molinia”. 


This is interesting because it can be argued that the Molinia dominance is a symptom of the degraded condition of the peat. However, grazing could be part of the solution - but as is known, there are questions about getting cattle into the right places to do this work in the periods when it is palatable. 


“Weeds and inappropriate species” is also mentioned on a number of occasions. This is often related to gorse and bracken, but also to the spread of young conifers that have “escaped” from the large plantations. This is also interesting - gorse and bracken can be important in themselves, as nurseries for scrub and woodland development.  Or in the case of bracken, as an important habitat in itself for some butterflies and for birds such as Whinchat.  But the point is, that in excess these can indeed impact on key features, and this needs careful consideration. 


Lastly, note that “managed burning” (“swaling”) is recorded as a pressure on the dwarf shrub heath in south Dartmoor. As said elsewhere, swaling is a significant issue for the future of Dartmoor's wildlife and habitats.


Table 2: Pressures on SSSI Designated Features 

SSSI

Designated Feature

Condition 2025

Pressure

South Dartmoor SSSI

Acid Grassland

Unfavourable Declining

Land management – Over grazing should be recorded as a pressure for this interest feature.


Land management (scrub encroachment and inappropriate species) should be recorded as a pressure for this interest feature.

North Dartmoor SSSI

Acid Grassland 

Unfavourable No Change 

Land Management – Over grazing should be monitored and recorded as a pressure for this interest feature

East Dartmoor SSSI

Acid Grassland / Dry Heath Mosaic

Unfavourable Declining

Land management – Over grazing and Weeds / Inappropriate species would be recorded as a pressure for this habitat if it was a feature of the SSSI. 

East Dartmoor SSSI

Blanket and Valley Bogs

Unfavourable Declining

Land management, in particular over and under grazing, should be recorded as a pressure for the blanket bog interest feature.

North Dartmoor SSSI

Blanket and Valley Bogs

Unfavourable No Change 

Land Management – Over and Under grazing should be included as a pressure

South Dartmoor SSSI

Blanket and Valley Bogs

Unfavourable Declining

Land management, in particular over and under grazing, should be recorded as a pressure for the blanket bog interest feature.

East Dartmoor SSSI

Short Sedge Acidic Fen

Unfavourable No Change 

Land management – Weeds / Inappropriate species and under grazing should be recorded as a pressure.  

North Dartmoor SSSI

Short Sedge Acidic Fen

Unfavourable No Change 

Land management – Weeds / Inappropriate species should be recorded as a pressure

South Dartmoor SSSI

Short Sedge Acidic Fen

Unfavourable Declining

Land management – Weeds / Inappropriate species should be recorded as a pressure.


Land management -Over grazing should be recorded as a pressure for this interest feature.

East Dartmoor SSSI

Subalpine dwarf shrub heath

Unfavourable Declining

Land management – over grazing and Weeds / Inappropriate species will be recorded as pressures to achieving favourable condition for subalpine dwarf shrub heath interest feature.

North Dartmoor SSSI

Subalpine dwarf shrub heath

Unfavourable No Change 

Land management – Over grazing should be recorded as a pressure for subalpine dwarf shrub heath.

South Dartmoor SSSI

Subalpine dwarf shrub heath

Unfavourable Declining

Land management – over grazing and Fire – Managed burning will be recorded as pressures to achieving favourable condition for subalpine dwarf shrub heath interest feature.

East Dartmoor SSSI

Wet Heath

Unfavourable Declining

Land management – Over Grazing should be recorded as a pressure for this interest feature.

North Dartmoor SSSI

Wet Heath

Unfavourable No Change 

Land management- over grazing should be recorded as a pressure for this interest feature.

South Dartmoor SSSI

Wet Heath

Unfavourable Declining

Land management – Over and Under Grazing should be recorded as a pressure for this interest feature.


Conclusions


This is the briefest summary of the data - there is much more to return to, not least further analysis of the condition of individual site units. 


These assessments of 'protected' sites have revealed their appalling condition. In many places, the trend is one of decline. 


The pressures listed reveal clearly that grazing remains a key issue. In many places, the evidence from Natural England shows that overgrazing continues to hold back recovery, particularly of heathland. In others, lack of grazing, especially by cattle, is allowing the Purple Moor grass on blanket bogs to further flourish on areas suffering the historic eroding effects of excessive burning and overgrazing. 


Over twenty years, millions of pounds of public money have been invested in restoring Dartmoor’s commons, and it has produced no change whatsoever, and in some places it’s got worse. What’s particularly galling is that we know, elsewhere, investing in nature restoration can deliver. 


We are in a nature and climate crisis. Dartmoor should be playing its part - but these shameful results show how much we need to start putting nature first in this special and much-loved landscape. And think very carefully how public money, our money, is invested in this place. 


We cannot keep funding failure.


 
 
 

BRINGING DARTMOOR BACK TO LIFE


Are you a visual artist, or a musician and composer, who loves Dartmoor and its wildlife?


Dartmoor Nature Alliance are seeking two talented artists to help bring our shared vision for Dartmoor’s nature to life.


As part of our exciting new project Bringing Dartmoor Back to Life, funded by the Devon Environment Foundation, we are commissioning a visual artist to create new images of how Dartmoor’s nature could be, and a musician / composer to create a new folk song about Dartmoor’s nature. 


Details can be found in the invitation to tender here:



Closing date for applications for musicians is 30th May 2025, and for visual artists, the closing date is extended until 16 June 2025


We look forward to hearing from you!

 
 
 

News and views from Dartmoor Nature Alliance

bottom of page